Re: FA 2018/2019
Inviato: 15/09/2018, 4:52
bure ha scritto: 14/09/2018, 16:00I don't have the power to do that, so THAT is bullshit.TheDominator ha scritto: 14/09/2018, 14:38 Whatever. It's the same bullshit. Bidding 0.2 over and over.
The point is, the UFA bidding process needs reform, and every time someone talks about it, you shut it down straight away.
you sure do. Any time one of myself, JS, or Biron bring up proposed changes, you mouth off and get your buddies to parrot your words on here.
No one prevents whoever thinks it's too small of an increment to make a much higher offer. You can directly offer the amount of money you are ready to pay for all the players you've interest for, and your problem is solved.Even 0.5 is bullshit. It's too small of an increment.
You're like Catholics, instead of caring only about their own business they feel entitled to dictate how other people who feel differently from them should behave.
No one is preventing you from offering milions of raise, not sure why others should be prevented from offering smaller raises.
That analogy is hilarious, because i'm an atheist. My point was completely missed in your endless diatribe of a response. The fact is, no matter what is offered, be it a serious offer or not, someone can always offer 0.2 multiple times and keep bumping it. The fact that you think this is completely ok is laughable.
that doesn't make any sense to me, but hey, maybe it will to others.If a player is currently bid on for 2 million, then 0.2 increments are fine for the next gm to bid, but if a player is currently bid on for 9 million, the next bid increment should be higher, something like 1 or 1.5 million
Then it seems simple concepts elude your understanding. This concept would basically eliminate GMs from bidding 0.2 repeatedly when bids are about to expire. It would mean GMs who are serious about a player, they will pay the right price for one. As bids are closer and closer to expiry, the increment to bid on those players should gradually get higher and higher. It would speed up the entire UFA process quite a bit, as GMs would need to actually use their brains and think about their bids and who they want on their team.
so.. as soon as someone offers a 3 yrs deal everyone else is forced to do the same? Lol, I guess strategy isn't welcomed anymore in fantasy hockeyThe same goes for term. If someone bids a 3 year term for a 9 million bid on a player, you shouldn't be able to make the next bid a 1 year contract, it should stay as a 3 year term
it's a working concept that warrants more discussion. What if the rule is enacted on players who are over a certain dollar amount? What if as soon as a player hits a high salary bid, they're locked in at that term? It is an outside-the-box idea. I rarely see you come up with any of your own ideas, but you are very quick to shit on everyone else's ideas. The only thing you've been consistently good at is finding GMs who give up on their team and then you are forced to find another GM to take over before the end of the season. Because as difficult as some here think that i am to talk with or deal with, at the very least i am involved, and at the very least i have the balls to say things that no one else has the balls to say.
as far as the only strategy i see you displaying right now is completely fucking up your goaltending for your team, and trying to sign every fucking backup in the entire NHL, good luck pal