kachlex ha scritto:
Explanation follows:
There are 2 LA 2010 3rd round picks. Why? One is standard LA 3rd rounder, the other has been created as compensation from Pittsburgh for Ryan Callahn during RFAs. Pitts gave up his 2011 3rd that became a new Los Angeles 2010 3rd rounder (that doesn't depend from LA ranking but is by default a mid round pick!).
imo this is where the problem starts though.. we need to give it a different name, to distinguish it from the standard pick. The compensation tag is there only as causal (between brackets), we need something to be also in the name to point out when it's a brand new pick created to replace the compensatory missing pick.
Otherwise confusion arises, having 2 picks with the same name.