and what exactly did Ontario pay to sign Eriksson at 7.2M coming off a strong season (instead of a 29pts season)?Snipeshow ha scritto:Really?
You guys are something else, I tell ya.
Trading 1 prospect that looked OKAY in the playoffs that is in the NHL and a late 2nd + 2 3rds and a salary move on D for a player that has 3 straight 70pt seasons before the lockout to go with a 30 goal season?
That gets vetoed?
Give me a fucking break.
nothing. zip. no assets lost.
And now that the contract is looking bad he gets back all that shit?