[Stanleit] Trade Commission

[ClaudeGiroux]

Is the quality starting goalie the junkie who just had a second surgery, is out indefinitely and is under contract for the worst team in the league?

Sent from my XQ-AS52 using Tapatalk

[bure]

hey hockey insider, could you tell us of what second surgery you're talking about?

[ClaudeGiroux]

True, my bad, I misread. He "only" has to restart rehab again.

I am sure the "quality starting goalie" will be ready for the 2023 season.

Sent from my XQ-AS52 using Tapatalk

[TheDominator]

At the very least, I have successfully pissed everyone off

[Hobbit83]

Per completezza e chiarezza, riporto quanto scritto altrove al proposito.

and which are the reasons why the trade is considered too one sided?

hint: NY being involved in the trade shouldn't be one

we are giving back a quality starting G that should be back in about 1 month, two regular RWs that are needed by the other team, and we are taking back a bad contract no one else in the league wanted any part of.

In the Rust deal that you didn't even bother to protest there was none of these assets going back and the RW acquired by Honolulu was a top 20 RW in terms of production and making 1.5M vs Pastrnak's 9M.

Rust is currently averaging 9.2 ftps/game at 1.5M, Pastrnak is averaging 7.2 fpts/game at 9M.

Honolulu received Rust at 1.5M for free, and was able to dump a 0.5M in the process. The seller did not advertise the need to cut cap nor the intention to sell Rust to do so, if they did they would have found a better buyer in 10 minutes.
We are instead paying two RWs, Carey Price, and taking on a bad fat contract for Pastrnak at 9M. Dom did announce he wanted to get rid of Monahan and found no one else willing to take on that contract.

How in this world can you veto this trade after the Rust trade was allowed to go through?

Io ho protestato la trade Rust, ma é stata considerata fuori tempo massimo. Per quanto mi riguarda, quella trade era assolutamente da bloccare e ho già detto a suo tempo che, a mio parere, se la trade di Rust l'avesse fatta NY ci sarebbero state le torce e i forconi in piazza. Quella trade é stato un grande errore e, personalmente, l'ho tenuta in considerazione. C'è chi sostiene che serva l'equivalente di una prima scelta per equilibrare questa trade e, in assoluto, sarei d'accordo (non fosse altro che per qualche ora mi aveva fatto un'offerta Halifax stessa che prevedeva un dump da parte sua E una prima E un'altra pick da parte mia, per dire. Non mi ha dato però nemmeno il tempo di esaminarla a fondo), ma proprio visto la trade di Rust io la lascerei passare anche con una pick di minore valore, facendola rientrare nell'enorme (a questo punto) margine di manovra.

Questo però non può significare qualcosa tipo "visto che abbiamo fatto una sciocchezza una volta, via libera a tutti"


Altrimenti, si fa una bella proposta: abolizione dei limiti alle trade e della commissione. Si vota e lanciamo la casa delle libertà, Brigittebardòbardò e facciamo un po' come cazzo ci pare.

Con tutti i rischi che questo comporta per la lega, però.

[bure]

Protesto lo scambio Acadie-Chattanooga, in cui Acadie riceve Lowry a 1M in cambio di due dump pluriennali

[MikiDion]

Hi guyz,
Protesto la chiamata di Zadorov da parte di NY: Keller non è ancora stato messo come LTIR (magari lo sarà domani visto l'infortunio, non di certo quando lo hanno messo loro) ma al momento è day-to-day: chiedo per questo che sia annullata la chiamata.
Thanks
https://www.nbcsportsedge.com/hockey/nhl/injury-report

[kachlex]

Attention
The following trades involve invalid picks (2026) and are under review. The commission will decide of/what to do.

20/02/2024
Acadie with Quebec
Detroit with Minnesota

11/01/2024
Halifax with Phila

First update
The commission wants to keep the rule as it is but since the site allowed the choice of the 2026 picks and at least one trade was at least 1 month in the past the trade will not be deleted.

However there will be some changes to the trade with the aim of removing 2026 picks involved where possibile or "rebalancing" the situation.

1. Where possibile, picks will be changed with a same round pick from previous years.

So
Detroit with Minnesota

• Pick 2026 round 3 from Minnesota  -> Pick 2025 round 3 from Minnesota
  

Acadie with Quebec

• Pick 2026 round 1 from Acadie -> TO BE DEFINED
  
• Pick 2026 round 2 from Acadie -> Pick 2025 round 2 from Acadie
  

Halifax with Phila

• Pick 2026 round 1 from Halifax -> TO BE DEFINED
  
• Pick 2026 round 3 from Halifax -> Pick 2025 round 3 from Halifax
  

Updates will follow...