Wolviesix ha scritto: 01/09/2021, 9:01 Se lo faccio notare mi dicono che non si rompono solo i RB.
Purtroppo @Whatarush latita da queste parti.
Ma perché si rompono solo i RB davvero?
Wolviesix ha scritto: 01/09/2021, 9:01 Se lo faccio notare mi dicono che non si rompono solo i RB.
Purtroppo @Whatarush latita da queste parti.
nkoso è sempre lì? Cam avrà chiesto il taglio per quello allora.acp ha scritto: 25/08/2021, 15:38 la gioia per essersi disfatti di sto bust si mischia alla solidarietà a wolvie.
venghino signori venghino c'è nkoso a prezzi di saldo.
Wolviesix ha scritto: 01/09/2021, 22:17 C'è chi ci ha fatto uno studio a riguardo per i fantasy.
http://www.nfl.com/fantasyfootball/stor ... y-it-works
In his study of injury risk among NFL skill position players, Funk applied some of the same principles and thought processes he used in his research with his clinical work. He used an intense, unbiased methodology sampling running backs and wide receivers within the top 100 of ADP from 2009 to 2015. The group analyzed for his study ended up with over 480 players (a 50/50 split of running backs and receivers)."
In Funk's sample, 92 running backs suffered a significant injury (missing ¼ of the season) whereas only 70 wide receivers suffered a significant injury. That calculates out to a .3833 risk in running backs to a .2917 risk in wide receivers.
Overall, Funk concludes in his research, "Early round running backs had about a 32 percent increased risk of missing significant playing time per season (four games missed) compared to that of wide receivers we would eliminate nearly 44 percent of potential injuries within our top eight picks by selecting wide receivers instead of running backs.
Quindi...sì.