folds arms, satisfied smile, another libtard owned

Gio ha scritto: 24/04/2020, 22:20 Ha, ci siamo (ri)cascati tutti, erano commenti sarcastici. Uno sherzo insomma.
Knighterrant ha scritto: 27/04/2020, 22:12Se veramente va così c'è il rischio che il buon vecchio Donald non lo mangi il panettone a sto giro
Inviato dal mio Nexus 5X utilizzando Tapatalk
Sto cercando l'articolo e non so se e` corretto ..... pero ........ According to a working paper published by the Becker Friedman Institute for Economics at the University of Chicago, the study looks specifically at behavior and health outcomes among the audiences of Fox News’ “Hannity” and “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” two of the most widely viewed cable news shows in the U.S. While Carlson began warning viewers in early February of the potential threat posed by the coronavirus, researchers found that Sean Hannity’s show initially ignored the issue, then downplayed the risks of the virus, accusing Democrats of using it as a political weapon to undermine Trump. The researchers found that “greater viewership of ‘Hannity’ relative to ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ is strongly associated with a greater number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in the early stages of the pandemic.”...
... We provide additional evidence consistent with misinformation being an important mechanism driving the effects in the data. While our findings cannot yet speak to long-term effects, they indicate that provision of misinformation in the early stages of a pandemic can have important consequences for how a disease ultimately affects the population.
President Donald Trump's administration abruptly cut funding to a non-profit conducting research on virus transmission between bats and humans, over unfounded rumors linking it to a research institute in Wuhan, Politico reported. EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based infectious-diseases research group, had all its future government funding cut to its five-year-long study on bat-to-human virus transmission, Politico reported.The cut came after rumors groundlessly accused EcoHealth Alliance of sending its $3.7 million grant received from the US government to fund the Wuhan Institute of Virology — the Chinese research lab which conspiracy theorists have, without evidence, accused of spreading the novel coronavirus to the public.
Inoltre, dal WaPostAt one moment in President Donald Trump’s coronavirus briefing on Monday, he was asked about reports that some states saw a spike in poison control calls after Trump suggested last week that perhaps human ingestion of disinfectants would be a way of combating the coronavirus.“I can’t imagine why,” Trump said, as he tried to move on to the next question.When Playboy‘s Brian Karem pressed him on whether he takes responsibility for it, Trump said, “No, I don’t.”
Trump has spoken for more than 28 hours in the 35 briefings held since March 16, eating up 60 percent of the time that officials spoke, according to a Washington Post analysis of annotated transcripts from Factba.se, a data analytics company. Over the past three weeks, the tally comes to more than 13 hours of Trump — including two hours spent on attacks and 45 minutes praising himself and his administration, but just 4½ minutes expressing condolences for coronavirus victims. He spent twice as much time promoting an unproven antimalarial drug that was the object of a Food and Drug Administration warning Friday. Trump also said something false or misleading in nearly a quarter of his prepared comments or answers to questions, the analysis shows.